Sunday, 22 March 2015

Tips for handling early-year medical expenses



The clock on insurance deductibles reset on Jan. 1, and that means big medical bills are in store for some. Patients may be required to pay thousands of dollars before their health care coverage kicks in.

Insurers typically begin or renew policies in January, and that means customers could face some daunting cost-sharing requirements in the first few months of the year. That’s especially true if they need surgery or have a particularly expensive prescription.

Deductibles topping $3,000 are common among plans sold on the health care overhaul’s public insurance exchanges, which provide coverage for millions. Companies also have been raising deductibles for years on employer-sponsored health plans, the most common form of coverage in the United States. Plus cost-sharing requirements for Medicare prescription drug coverage renew every year.

All this adds up to a business boon for organizations like the Patient Access Network Foundation, which offers grants to help cover prescription costs for dozens of life-threatening, chronic or rare diseases. The nonprofit had to hire about 80 temporary employees to help handle the heavy workload it receives at the start of the year. It fielded 4,000 calls a day last month, double its normal total.

“Everybody who works doing what we do has the same challenge,” CEO Daniel Klein said.

Klein’s foundation is one option patients can turn to if too many expenses hit at the start of the year. Here are some other tips.

Understand your coverage: You can’t prepare for medical expenses until you know how big the bills might be. Your insurance should come with a plan summary that lays out important numbers.

Start by understanding your plan’s deductibles, which can differ significantly depending on whether care is received inside or outside the insurer’s network of providers.

If you take prescriptions, double check how much they will cost. Drug coverage is commonly divided into tiers based on price, and costs can change from year to year.

Most coverage offers some protection by capping the amount you are required to pay each year. But these caps might still expose patients to sizeable bills because they can climb higher than $6,000 for an individual and $13,000 for a family.

Talk to your doctor: Physicians may be able to offer less-expensive treatment alternatives, but be clear on whether these choices are equally effective. If you’re planning a surgery, ask whether it can be delayed, perhaps after you may have satisfied your deductible.

Avoid skipping care entirely. That may make your condition worse, and the unpaid deductible you’re trying to avoid might still need to be satisfied.

Seek help: Big medical expenses at the start of the year can be shocking, especially for patients who are already dealing with leftover holiday bills or other financial headaches. There are a number of agencies that have years of experience helping patients deal with this.

The Patient Access Network Foundation can offer grants of more than $10,000 in some cases to help with expenses. It also provides a list of additional organizations that can assist.

Drug makers frequently help cover out-of-pocket expenses for some of their priciest products. Contact the company that makes your medication or check out the Partnership for Prescription Assistance .

That site, which is supported by drug makers, acts as a clearinghouse to help link patients to hundreds of assistance programs.

Shop around: Many insurers now offer smartphone apps or other services that help patients compare prices for care based on their coverage. It pays to shop around for non-urgent care because costs can vary quite a bit.

For instance, the cost of a primary care doctor visit can range from $117 to $461 inside an insurer’s coverage network in San Francisco, according to Cast light Health Inc., which has designed a technology platform to help employers manage costs and employees shop for care.

Plan ahead: Many employer-sponsored high-deductible plans come with health savings accounts that can ease the sting from early-year medical expenses. These accounts can let families set aside as much as $6,650 before taxes for medical expenses, and employers often contribute to them. But that safeguard requires some foresight. You generally have to sign up for it before your coverage begins.

If you can’t start a health savings account, you can set aside some money from each paycheck in a savings account. If that expense never hits, keep the money parked. You may need it next year, when your coverage renews your deductible resets once again.
Read More

Wednesday, 18 March 2015

Insure your Business in the Clouds

In the turn of the most technologically advanced era yet come more and more advanced fraudulent acts as well.  The genius invention of cyber insurance have helped small, medium and large scale businesses in securing their data, shared information and hacked systems. These cyber insurance have already reached not only the leading nations in the world but developing cities and countries as well such as Singapore, Jakarta, Indonesia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, Beijing, China, Tokyo, Japan and many more. If you are one of those who have individual experience with spam, scams, hacks and other illegal computer malpractice, then we at Westhill Insurance Consulting would want to enumerate top ten reasons why cyber insurance is important: 

1.       Data is one of the most important assets yet it is not covered by standard insurance policies. It is many times worth as the physical product or service that a company is offering. Yet, most business owners do not realize the worth of these data and do not have a standard policy when the files are corrupted, damaged or destroyed. A cyber policy can provide comprehensive cover for data restoration and rectification of a loss no matter how it was caused and up to the full policy limits.
2.       Systems are critical to operating your day to day business but their downtime is not covered by the standard business operations interruption insurance. All businesses rely to available systems to operate and organize their business. In the event of a hack attack, scam or computer virus a traditional business interruption policy would not respond. Cyber insurance can cover for the loss of profits associated with a system outrage that is caused by a non-physical peril like a computer virus or service attack.
3.       Cyber crime is the fastest growing crime in the world but most attacks are not covered by the standard property and crime insurance. New crimes and complaints are emerging every day. With the use of the internet means that they are exposed to the world’s criminals and is vulnerable to attack any time of the day and night. Cyber insurance can provide comprehensive crime cover for a wide range of electronic perils that are increasingly threatening the financial resources of today’s businesses.
4.       Your reputation is your number one asset and it is a must that you are to insure it. Any business is built on its reputation. Although there are indeed some reputational risks that cannot be insured, you can insure your reputation in the event of a security breach. When your systems, files and data have been compromised, you run a very big risk of losing the trust of your most loyal clients which can harm not only your business but your whole life as well. Cyber insurance can not only help pay for the costs of engaging a PR firm to help restore this, but also for the loss of future sales that arise as a direct result of customers switching to your competitors.

More insurance consultations can be found at http://www.westhillinsuranceconsulting.com/blog/. Learn more about insurance for your family and your own welfare.
Read More

Sunday, 18 January 2015

The 5 Best Money Lessons We Learned Last Year

1. It’s Smart to Prepare for a Breach
How many data breaches from 2014 can you name? The freshest one in your mind is probably the Sony hack, but there were also attacks on Home Depot, Staples, Dairy Queen, P.F. Chang’s the list goes on. Credit.com Co-Founder and Chairman Adam Levin recently wrote about the most important lessons you can learn from the Sony hack, encouraging consumers and companies to prioritize data security and behave with the knowledge that your personal information and correspondence could be exposed at any time.

Prepare for the possibility of fraud by monitoring your credit, regularly reviewing account activity and knowing what to do if your personal information has been stolen. Do what you can to strengthen your data security, but know that so much of it is beyond your control, so the best thing you can do is know how to react to a breach.

2. Communication Is Crucial to Getting Debt-Free as a Couple
We published several success stories about getting out of debt, but some of the most memorable involved couples working together to conquer their finances. The stories had similar themes: Ellie Kay married her husband without knowing about his $40,000 of consumer debt, and Ja’Net Adams was unaware her husband took out student loans to pay for college. Both families eventually hit breaking points where they realized debt was holding them back, and they needed to make drastic changes to get rid of it.

Getting out of debt is never easy, and the more people who are involved, the more complicated it can be. At the same time, having someone to work through the challenges with you can be extremely helpful. Adams’ and Kay’s stories highlight two crucial elements of getting debt free: staying committed to a plan and remaining open and honest about the process’ progress and challenges. Those lessons apply to any personal finance goal, whether you’re planning with a family or on your own.

3. Staying Up to Date on Your Credit Is Easier Than Ever
There’s really no excuse these days for not knowing what’s going on with your credit. You can get two of your credit scores for free every 30 days on Credit.com, and you probably have access to other free credit score tools, too. FICO rolled out a program called FICO Open Access, which allows consumers with certain financial products (including Discover credit cards and some Sallie Mae student loans) to review their FICO scores for free. In the past year, many more of these programs have become available to consumers, free of charge, because there’s a strong belief that an informed consumer makes better financial decisions.

Looking at the same credit score periodically helps you understand how your behavior, like credit card use and loan repayment, affects your credit. It can also help you spot and stop fraud and identity theft.

4. Paying for Health Services Is Harder Than It Should Be
In September, Credit.com Director of Consumer Education Gerri Detweiler broke her hand, resulting in a trip to the ER and a messy experience with medical bills.

“Our medical billing system is far too complicated and convoluted,” Detweiler wrote in a December post for Credit.com. “For all the talk of putting patients more in charge of their care, there is little opportunity to make informed decisions. One of the main things that irked me was my complete inability to confirm whether I received the services my insurance company and I paid for.”

This is coming from a woman whose first question upon arriving at the emergency room was whether the provider was in her insurance network. Detweiler’s experience shows you have to be exceptionally persistent in gathering information about your medical bills, otherwise you’ll easily lose track of something and possibly receive a collection notice about it. Even with her diligent record-keeping and frequent efforts to communicate with billing departments, Detweiler still doesn’t have all the answers she wants about her brief emergency room visit.

5. More Education on Student Loan Debt Is Needed
In December, the Brookings Institution released a report saying about half of students polled in a nationally representative survey didn’t know how much they borrowed for their education. That’s absurd. How can people prepare to repay debt if they have no idea how much of it they have?

Add this to the general consensus that borrowers aren’t well enough aware of their student loan repayment options, and the high default rate among student loan borrowers makes a lot of sense. Granted, the share of borrowers who defaulted within three years of entering repayment declined this year, from 14.7% to 13.7%, but that’s still a huge default rate. Considering it takes months of missed payments to default in the first place, there are millions of borrowers who are having serious trouble repaying their education debt who haven’t yet hit the dreaded point of default.

Not only do students need to have a better idea of what they’re getting themselves into when they take out student loans, they need to be well versed in their repayment options, should they find themselves unable to make the payments.

A lot happened in the personal finance world in 2014, and 2015 is sure to be similarly eventful. If these stories are any indication, the best thing you can do to ensure a productive financial year is to make sure you’re informed about your financial situation, credit standing and options for getting out or staying out of debt.

Reference:
The 5 Best Money Lessons We Learned Last Year
Read More

Sunday, 21 December 2014

Data breach trends for 2015: Credit cards, healthcare records will be vulnerable



The data breaches of 2014 have yet to fade into memory, and we already have 2015 looming. Experian's 2015 Data Breach Industry Forecast gives us much to anticipate, and I've asked security experts to weigh in with their thoughts for the coming year as well.

Experian highlights a number of key factors that will drive or contribute to data breaches in 2015. A few of them aren't surprising: Organizations are focusing too much on external attacks when insiders are a significantly bigger threat, and attackers are likely to go after cloud-based services and data. A few new factors, however, merit your attention.

First, there is a looming deadline of October, 2015 for retailers to upgrade to point-of-sale systems capable of processing chip-and-PIN credit cards. As banks and credit card issuers adopt more secure chip-and-PIN cards, and more consumers have them in hand, it will be significantly more difficult to clone cards or perpetrate credit card fraud. That’s why Experian expects cybercriminals to increase the volume of attacks early in 2015, to compromise as much as possible while they still can.

The third thing that stands out in the Experian report is an increased focus on healthcare breaches. Electronic medical records and the explosion of health or fitness-related wearable devices make sensitive personal health information more vulnerable than ever to being compromised or exposed.

The risk of health related data being breached is also a concern voiced by Ken Westin, security analyst with Tripwire. He pointed out that part of the reason that retail breaches have escalated is because cybercriminals have developed the technologies and market for monetizing that data. “The bad news is that other industries can easily become targets once a market develops for the type of data they have. I am particularly concerned about health insurance fraud—its driving increasing demand for health care records and most healthcare organizations are not prepared for the level of sophistication and persistence we have seen from attackers in the retail segment.”

“There will absolutely be more breaches in 2015—possibly even more than we saw in 2014 due to the booming underground market for hackers and cybercriminals around both credit card data and identity theft,” warned Kevin Routhier, founder and CEO of Core Telligent. “This growing market, coupled with readily available and productized rootkits, malware and other tools will continue to drive more data breaches in the coming years as this is a lucrative practice for enterprising criminals.”

The rise in data breach headlines, however, may not necessarily suggest an increase in actual data breaches. It’s possible that organizations are just getting better at discovering that they’ve been breached, so it gets more attention than it would have in previous years.

Tim Erlin, director of IT risk and security strategy for Tripwire, echoed that sentiment. “The plethora of announced breaches in the news this year is, by definition, a trailing indicator of actual breach activity. You can only discover breaches that have happened, and there’s no indication that we’re at the end of the road with existing breach activity. Because we expect organizations to improve their ability to detect the breaches, we’ll see the pattern of announcements continue through 2015.”

The combination of a rise in actual data breach attacks and an increase in the ability to discover them will make 2015 a busy year for data breaches. Whether we’re defending against new attacks, or just detecting existing breaches that have already compromised organizations, there will be no shortage of data breach headlines in 2015.



For more info: Westhill Insurance Consulting Data breach trends for 2015: Credit cards, healthcare records will be vulnerable.
Read More

Sunday, 14 December 2014

Medicare Overbilling Probes Run Into Political Pressure

When investigators suspected that Houston’s Riverside General Hospital had filed Medicare claims for patients who weren’t treated, they moved to block all payments to the facility. Then politics intervened.

Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee, a Texas Democrat, contacted the federal official who oversees Medicare, Marilyn Tavenner, asking her to back down, according to documents reviewed by The Wall Street Journal. In a June 2012 letter to Ms. Tavenner, Rep. Jackson Lee said blocking payments had put the hospital at financial risk and “jeopardized” patients needing Medicare.

Weeks later, Ms. Tavenner, administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, instructed deputies to restore most payments to the hospital even as the agency was cooperating in a criminal investigation of the facility, according to former investigators and documents. “These changes are at the direction of the Administrator and have the highest priority,” a Medicare official wrote to investigators.

About two months after that order, Riverside’s top executive was indicted in a $158 million fraud scheme. The hospital was barred from Medicare this May, and the CEO was convicted in October.

What happened at Riverside General Hospital shows how political pressure from medical providers and elected officials can collide with efforts to rein in waste and abuse in the nearly $600 billion, taxpayer-funded Medicare system. More than a dozen former investigators and CMS officials said in interviews that they faced questions from members of Congress about policy changes or punitive action affecting providers or individual doctors.

Ricky Sluder, a former senior investigator for a Medicare contractor who oversaw part of the Riverside investigation, said “it was extremely frustrating to stall an investigation to give some explanation to a lawmaker. It’s providers’ way of using political power.”

In an emailed statement, Medicare administrator Ms. Tavenner said the Riverside episode “reflected the tension between fraud prevention and access to care.” She said she wasn’t aware of the pending indictments and that her job required her to “balance two important policy goals” — saving taxpayer money and protecting Medicare’s beneficiaries.

A spokesman for Rep. Jackson Lee declined to comment.

Medicare has reported that during the 2013 fiscal year, waste, fraud and abuse accounted for an estimated $34.6 billion in improper payments to medical providers. CMS says it clawed back about $9 billion that year through audits and investigations.

Medicare hires contractors to enforce antifraud rules and fight improper billing. The contractors can suspend payments to doctors and hospitals and revoke billing privileges. They also can block some payments to review claims — called “prepayment review.”

Such actions can squeeze medical providers and even threaten to put them out of business. Medical providers sometimes seek help from elected officials. Politicians have a stake in such disputes: Health providers often provide jobs and valued services in their districts, and can be campaign contributors.

Houston’s Riverside hospital, for example, had treated patients in that district for nearly 100 years and employed about 200 in 2011.

Ted Doolittle, a former deputy director of the Center for Program Integrity, CMS’s antifraud unit, said most legislators support Medicare’s efforts to fight fraud. But “the member who just lost 150 jobs in her district at the hands of faceless Washington bureaucrats, she is flipping livid,” he said.

Mr. Doolittle, who left the agency in May and joined law firm LeClairRyan, said the antifraud office should be sheltered from political pressure, which he said can interfere with investigations. CMS’s top fraud investigator reports to Ms. Tavenner, who was appointed by President Barack Obama in 2011 and whose agency is overseen by Congress.

In her statement, Ms. Tavenner said: “I must be available and responsive to each of the constituencies that CMS serves, including our beneficiaries, professional associations and elected officials.”

Over the past five full years, medical providers and health-care interests spent $2.5 billion lobbying federal officials and lawmakers, according to the Center for Responsive Politics, fueled in part by a surge before passage of the 2010 health law. That constitutes 15% of all federal lobbying over that period.

The health-care industry long has contributed to lawmakers who oversee government health spending. In the current election cycle, for example, hospitals and nursing homes gave $218,800 to Rep. Kevin Brady, the Texas Republican who became chairman of the House Ways and Means health subcommittee last year, through his personal campaign fund and two political-action committees, according the Center for Responsive Politics. Those contributors gave $39,500 to him in 2012 when he didn’t hold the key position, and when his overall contributions also were less. Prior chairmen of health committees also saw jumps in such donations.

The Ways and Means Committee crafted a March bill that barred Medicare recovery auditors from scrutinizing short hospital stays — historically, an area of concern for incorrect payments — until April 2015. Last month, Rep. Brady put forward a discussion draft for a bill to overhaul audits of those short stays and provide a “comprehensive solution” to hospital payments for those visits, according to a statement from his office.

Hospital lobbyists credited the Ways and Means Committee and Rep. Brady for helping on the audit issue.

A spokeswoman for Rep. Brady said he supports the Medicare audit program “and wants to ensure it is accomplishing its mission — deterring fraud, waste and abuse.” But the current rules for short hospital stays, she said, are “arbitrary” and lack “clinical basis.” She said the March decision was made by Republican leaders in the House.

Medicare providers under investigation sometimes contact lobbying organizations for help.

Medicare investigators began looking into Florida skilled-nursing facilities in 2011 and found what they considered suspicious billing patterns at 33 homes. CMS contractor SafeGuard Services LLC was concerned about how often Florida nursing facilities were charging for the costliest physical and occupational-therapy services, according to documents. About a quarter of the 33 facilities were paid at least 20% more a day than their local rivals, a Journal analysis of Medicare data found.

Three of the 33 are owned by Plaza Health Network. Plaza Chief Executive William Zubkoff previously ran a hospital that was barred in 2006 from billing Medicare and other federal health-care programs following fraud allegations. The U.S. attorney’s office for the Southern District of Florida also is investigating whistleblower allegations that Plaza paid kickbacks for patient referrals between 2008 and 2011.

Lawyers for Plaza and Dr. Zubkoff said neither has done anything wrong and both are cooperating with the investigation. They said Dr. Zubkoff wasn’t personally accused of wrongdoing in the 2006 matter.

By 2012, the Medicare investigators had partially blocked payments to the 33 nursing homes.

Some of the nursing homes contacted the Florida Health Care Association, a trade group. It asked lawmakers and Florida Governor Rick Scott, a Republican, for assistance, according to the group’s director and emails.

Gov. Scott contacted Ms. Tavenner, according to a person familiar with the investigation. The two had once worked together at hospital operator HCA Holdings Inc., where both had been executives. The governor’s office connected CMS to the Florida Health Care Association. The trade group put an owner of two of the nursing homes, William Kelsey, on the phone with Ms. Tavenner.

Mr. Kelsey told her the prepayment reviews were “creating a real hardship on the business, staff and residents,” he recalled recently.

On Aug. 22, 2012, Ms. Tavenner ordered the agency’s antifraud officials to release payments for the 33 homes, including the two operated by Mr. Kelsey, according to emails.

A CMS spokesman said Ms. Tavenner got involved to ensure the agency was “preserving access and quality of care.” The spokesman said Ms. Tavenner “often discusses issues and concerns with elected officials . . . including Gov. Scott.”

In an email ordering SafeGuard to restore payments, John Spiegel, a Medicare antifraud official, said one reason for the action was that the nursing homes were “established providers with long-standing history.”

“Thanks to you and Governor Scott, some sanity has prevailed,” Florida Health Care Association Executive Director J. Emmett Reed wrote to a Scott staffer that Aug. 22.

The spokesman for Gov. Scott said he couldn’t confirm or deny that the governor called Ms. Tavenner about the nursing homes.

Medicare later told its antifraud contractors to avoid using “prepayment review” on skilled-nursing facilities without first receiving approval from CMS, according to documents. The CMS spokesman said the agency instructed contractors to use other approaches to recoup money before resorting to prepayment review.

Former investigators for SafeGuard, a unit of Hewlett-Packard Co., said that decision stripped them of an important tool for fighting fraud and chilled their nursing-home probe. SafeGuard referred questions to CMS.

The CMS spokesman said there is “no single viewpoint” about the value of various antifraud tools, and the agency must also consider patients’ access to care.

As of January 2014, none of the Florida nursing homes caught in SafeGuard’s probe faced any new prepayment action, a former investigator said.

The CMS spokesman said the agency advised law enforcement of its concerns about seven of the nursing homes and that its antifraud investigators referred 30 of them to another contractor to attempt to recoup excess payments.

Houston’s Riverside General Hospital already had been tangling with law enforcement before Rep. Jackson Lee contacted CMS.

In February 2012, in a separate case, the hospital’s assistant administrator, Mohammad Khan, pleaded guilty to defrauding Medicare, admitting that many services weren’t medically necessary and in some cases never provided.

By that time, Medicare antifraud contractor Health Integrity LLC had concluded that 88% of a sampling of Riverside’s partial-hospitalization claims — Medicare’s term for certain outpatient mental-health services — were incorrect, according to government records.

That June 8, Medicare suspended all payments to the facility and put its claims on prepayment review.

Then Rep. Jackson Lee jumped in. In a June 18 letter to Ms. Tavenner, she said the action could harm the “most vulnerable patients.”

Mr. Doolittle, a senior Medicare antifraud official at the time, responded in writing that “the balance favors protecting [Medicare] and the taxpayers,” and the agency would continue to block funds.

At a follow-up meeting that July with Medicare antifraud officials, Rep. Jackson Lee argued that Riverside was the area’s only provider of certain mental-health services, according to CMS investigation records.

Medicare antifraud officials determined that six other providers within 10 miles of Riverside offered the same services, records show, and they again declined to restore payments.

Rep. Jackson Lee spoke with Ms. Tavenner, according to people familiar with the investigation. Ms. Tavenner “listened to her concerns” about how the payment suspension could limit patients’ access to care, the Medicare spokesman said.

Afterward, Ms. Tavenner instructed her antifraud team to restore 70% of Medicare payments to Riverside, effective immediately, according to an email to contractors from a Medicare antifraud official.

At that time, a criminal investigation into Riverside executives, including CEO Earnest Gibson III, was already under way. Ms. Tavenner’s spokesman told the Journal she was unaware of details of the criminal investigation when she ordered the resumption of payments. However, Ms. Tavenner and senior Medicare officials had discussed the possibility of pending law-enforcement action in a conference call earlier the same day, according to one person who was on the call.

Two months after Ms. Tavenner ordered the payment release, federal agents arrested Mr. Gibson at the hospital and charged him with crimes related to health-care fraud.

Medicare officials resumed blocking payments to Riverside, according to investigation records. This May, Riverside’s Medicare billing privileges were revoked for two years, Medicare emails show. A lawyer for the hospital, Clement Aldridge Jr., said the facility now is “on its last breath,” with most of it closed.

Garnet Coleman, the state representative for Riverside’s district, said that after the payments stopped, “there were no patients, so there was no money.” He said low-income people now have fewer choices for psychiatric care.

“We need that kind of care in the community,” he said. But in the end, he said, it became clear to him that the person handling the disputed program “broke the rules.”

Mr. Gibson, the CEO, was convicted in October. His lawyer, Dick DeGuerin, said his client is innocent and is seeking a new trial.

In a recent interview, Mr. Gibson said he was unaware of fraudulent billing at the time, and that he later learned that an employee and some contractors submitted fraudulent bills for their own gain. He said executives sought to retract incorrect bills.

Mr. Gibson said he sought help from Rep. Jackson Lee to “make sure we got a fair shot.”

This June 12, Rep. Jackson Lee requested a phone meeting with Ms. Tavenner to discuss Riverside, an email shows.

CMS employees prepared talking points for Ms. Tavenner, advising her to inform the congresswoman that a revocation of hospital billing privileges is “appealable,” an email shows.

Asked about the June meeting, the Medicare spokesman said Ms. Tavenner “tries to listen to as many of the concerns that are raised as possible and ask many questions of our CMS staff to make sure we are preserving access and quality of care while aggressively preventing and punishing fraud.”
Read More

Sunday, 7 December 2014

There Is a Reason We Never Crack Down on Medicare Fraud

Did you know there’s a government program that gives more than $60 billion a year to felons and voracious, unscrupulous hospitals and doctors?

There is: improper health-care payments. In FY 2012, Medicare fee-for-service, Medicare Advantage, and Medicaid produced $61.9 billion in improper spending. $30 billion of that is Medicare alone. It should anger us, obviously, but also worry us, because the federal government is expanding its reach into the health-care market as we speak. 

Congress is doing very little to address all that fraud and waste and the little it does is very ineffective. Nobody in the health care system has a real incentive to crack down on fraudulent or mistaken payments, so nothing gets done about it. In an eye-opening piece last year, Citizens Against Government Waste’s Leslie Paige laid out the efforts by health-care providers and some lawmakers from both parties to slow down the rate of improper payments through recovery audit contractors (RACs).

This means that wasteful and fraudulent spending will continue to cost taxpayers billions — when it doesn’t have to, or certainly doesn’t need to in the same proportion.

It has other tragic effects too. Case in point (via Michael Cannon): 

U.S. Attorney Barbara McQuade will seek life in prison for what she called “the most egregious” health care fraud case she has ever seen. McQuade said that in addition to insurance fraud, which involved a $35-million Medicare fraud scheme from 2009 until the present, Fata also harmed, and in some cased subsequently killed, his patients with dangerous chemotherapy drugs they did not need. According to government records, Fata’s medical practice included 1,200 patients. The formerly prominent cancer doctor will be sentenced in February before U.S. District Judge Paul Borman. The doctor’s bond was set at $9 million.

First and foremost, this fraudulent doctor caused suffering and event death. But the added tragedy is Medicare’s inability or unwillingness to prevent fraud. If he hadn’t been caught and stopped because of the vigilance of a nurse concerned for the welfare of her patients and a few others, the fraud would likely still be going on.

Read More

Monday, 27 October 2014

BBB Tip of the Week

Open enrollment for many 2015 health insurance plans is around the corner.

Those searching for plans online may think they have found a great deal when they’ve found a scam.

Recently, a bogus trade association encouraged people and small businesses to pay for membership in order to qualify for health insurance. Once members, they would pay their monthly health insurance “premium,” anywhere from $40 to $1,000, thinking they had purchased a comprehensive health insurance plan. Instead they were paying premium prices for a medical discount plan with very limited discounts for just a few doctors and hospitals.

The FTC has reached settlements stopping two businesses perpetrating such schemes: Independent Association of Businesses and Health Service Providers Inc.

Similar online schemes may still be operating. In addition, online phishing scams are eager to collect your personal information by pretending to offer health insurance.

The Better Business Bureau offers the following tips to keep your information safe and find legitimate health insurance:

• Don’t share your personal information online unless you are completely certain that the website is legitimate.

• To be certain that you are dealing with a legitimate health insurance exchange, start your search at www.healthcare.gov.

• If you would rather deal directly with an insurance company or broker, research the company first.  Also check the company’s business review at www.bbb.org or by calling (455)-4200.

• To verify that the health insurance plan and company are legitimate, check with the Washington state Office of the Insurance Commissioner at www.insurance.wa.gov.

• Insurance plans have policy details available for you to review before you enroll. If an insurance broker, company or association refuses to give you up-front details about a policy, then it is probably a scam.

If you’ve been the victim of or suspect a health insurance scam, file complaints with the Washington state Office of the Insurance Commissioner at www.insurance.wa.gov, the FTC at www.ftccomplaintassistant.gov, and the BBB at www.bbb.org. 
Read More